SMI’s Kristy Martino Champions Human Creativity at CopyCon 2026
Each year, writers, marketers, strategists, and creatives unite at CopyCon, “the largest event dedicated to the power of words to build business.” This year, SMI’s own Creative Lead Kristy Martino delivered the keynote speech, “Who’s Afraid of Creative? The Staying Power of Human Creativity.” I sat down with Kristy after the conference to talk about storytelling, creative work, and rejecting mediocrity to make way for abundance.
The theme of this year’s CopyCon conference was “AI versus Humanity.” How did you interpret that theme?
I thought it was interesting that they intentionally said “versus.” What I’ve been hearing and reading from our industry is a reluctance to take a side. And I don’t think CopyCon’s intention was to force people to take sides; they just wanted to acknowledge the fact that there are these two entities that people are arguing about, and two different kinds of approaches to creative work.
So, I interpreted it as, “What if one of those elements was taken away?” So, what if there was no AI, or what if there was no humanity–what would creative work look like? That was kind of my starting point.
So what do you think it would look like if one of those was taken away?
Well that’s what made me take the side of humanity. In my opening keynote, I set the tone for the day: I’m going to take a stance; you don’t have to agree with me, but I believe very strongly in the power of human storytelling, and that, to me, is something that AI at this moment cannot replicate. Nor do I think that it will ever be able to replicate it. So, why is that important, and why is that critical for the work that we do? Why is storytelling still powerful?
In my experience, the stuff that really sticks with people – that changes people’s minds and changes their perception of the world around them – comes through stories. It doesn’t come through statistics. It doesn’t come through super polished white papers or even advertisements that are devoid of emotion. The stuff that really works and moves people is rooted in human storytelling. So if that went away, A) the world would just be incredibly boring for me and B) I think we would all lose connection and the desire for connection. There’s no upside for me on that.
You spoke on a panel about AI with Harendra Kapur, David Levin and Tim Tucker. and Lorraine Forrest-Turner. Can you tell us a little bit about that discussion?
Both Harendra and Tim were adamant supporters of AI. They use it very often in their work, in very specific ways. David Levin was kind of on the fence and you know hadn’t really brought it into his work. So everyone had a really interesting perspective. I think the biggest eye-opener for me came from Harendra when he was talking about how his use of AI allows him to play so much. He was lamenting this loss of being able to present clients with risky, weird stuff. So he started taking that on for himself and developing things and making stuff in AI that was super out there – things that he could play with and do quickly and it helped his workflow and process in terms of creative thinking. That wasn’t necessarily a generative output, but it was a way for him to play in a sandbox that wasn’t going to be judged or rejected. It was just something that he can stretch his muscles into. I found that really captivating. And it didn’t make me say, “Oh! I’m going to do that too. I’m going to adopt that practice.” I have a different set of criteria around using AI or not using it. But I appreciated how he approached it.
Do you think there’s a way for creatives on opposite ends of the AI-use spectrum to coexist or collaborate?
That’s a great question and falls in line with one of the questions that was asked by the audience. They had asked, “How do I talk about this at work? How do I even broach the subject of whether we should use AI, how we should use it, etc.?”
My position isn’t that I want to dictate to everybody around me to either use it or don’t use it. But it is being intentional and transparent about how we use it and about how we collaborate on things. I don’t have those specific ideas for how to collaborate. What I would like is to be clear on when someone is using it, and how I enter into that collaboration. We’re still in the beginning phase of this technology, where folks are either a little embarrassed or ashamed to admit that they’ve used it. Anytime there’s anything opaque, I think that’s where things get iffy.
I certainly think there are ways of collaborating, and that’s a challenge for me. How do I work with people like Harendra who’s doing interesting things with AI? I wouldn’t want to say no to collaborating with someone like that.
Personally, where do you think the use of AI is leaving humanity?
My concern around AI is not necessarily centered on the ways in which people use it–creatively or not creatively. I think my concern is this strategic messaging from the people who control these platforms, saying, “If you don’t use this and adopt it, you’re going to be left behind.” I think that’s disingenuous, and I think it’s dangerous thinking. Especially for young people that are just starting their careers, I think they are feeling as though they have to spend more time learning how to prompt this machine than learning how to be curious about something, how to research well, how to dive into psychology. And I’m sure there’s pushback from people saying, “AI can do all those things for you.” Okay, but what do we lose out on when we’re not thinking about how to craft a question, or where to look, or stepping outside of a screen, or stepping outside of a platform that is designed to please you. I think that’s dangerous and it degrades the quality of culture. I think it’s that big.
I don’t want to be another person that says, “Well, it’s here. We need to deal with it.” It’s here, and if we don’t want to deal with it, we have to investigate why we don’t want to deal with it, and why is everyone else feeling like they have to use it.
We should start with that question. I feel like we’re not allowed to ask that. You’re not allowed to raise your hand and say, “But why?” Because it’s efficient? That’s not proven. And in many cases it’s incredibly inefficient.
What were your key takeaways from your CopyCon experience?
I’ll tell you what the number one takeaway was. There was all this conversation about how people use AI, should they use it–tons of really fantastic, stellar, top-notch panelists and workshops. But there was an absolute energy the whole day. And you know, it’s a virtual conference.
I’ve done virtual workshops, but I have never done a virtual keynote before. So I’m used to being in front of people and really responding off of that in-person wavelength. So I was a little worried about that, but I still felt it and I could see it in the chat, in the comments, and people were incredibly active, and posing really good questions and pushing back, and just being really curious. So that was my big takeaway of gathering with a group of people who are struggling with the same things that you’re struggling with, enjoying the same things that you’re enjoying–it’s such a fulfilling experience. And everybody felt that way. Everyone was like, “This was such an uplift.” And that has nothing to do with artificial intelligence.
Yeah, that’s why we were there, because that was the theme of the conference, but the reason why we felt that way was because of each other. Because of the humans that we were interacting with. Not because we were super psyched about Claude, right?
That energy lasted for days. LinkedIn was blowing up with people talking about your speech and how it moved them and made them think.
I think people are moved because it’s rooted in story and in a human experience, and it’s not trying to present facts and figures. I could have presented a whole half an hour on research, and studies that people have done. But you know when you talk about what’s really happening, and how I feel about what’s happening in my career–and the thing that I love, copywriting–it sticks with people more.
Do you think you’ll attend this conference again?
Absolutely. It was really incredible. Very well-produced. And very thoughtful. Titling it “AI versus Humanity” felt really intentional. They were trying to confront really hard things, but be respectful of everybody’s point of view. And you can’t ask for anything more than that from a conference.





